TCPA Class Action Brought Against President Trump’s Campaign

While some people may be under the mistaken impression that a non-profit entity such as a political campaign is immune from the regulations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), a newly filed class action against the literal President of the United States of America demonstrates that this isn’t true.

California Court Applies Broad Definition of ATDS from Marks

A new decision by the Eastern District of California made use of the Ninth Circuit’s broad definition of what constitutes an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) from last year’s Marks v. Crunch San Diego decision. The Court’s decision to grant the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgement in a new case provides further evidence of the… Continue reading California Court Applies Broad Definition of ATDS from Marks

District Court Rules the Plaintiff Cannot Revoke Consent Through Strategies Such as the Use of a Fake British Accent

The plaintiff in Johnson v. Capital One Servs., No. 18-cv-62058, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159633 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2019) attempted a novel technique in order to provoke Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations from the defendant: trying to revoke consent by speaking with a fake British accent and telling the defendant’s agent that they were… Continue reading District Court Rules the Plaintiff Cannot Revoke Consent Through Strategies Such as the Use of a Fake British Accent

Two New District Court Rulings Apply Statutory Definition of ATDS

A year ago, the landmark Ninth Circuit decision in Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC broadened the definition of what constitutes an Automatic Telephone Dialing System (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Finding the statutory definition to be vague, the court disregarded the precedent of Dominguez v. Yahoo